On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:12:49 -0400 (EDT), Jon Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not "svn update"? It takes puts less bandwidth on both > servers, and runs much quicker.
Ah, but then why not "svn up"? Even quicker! ;) So sure, it would remove the need to press 'p' on the first SVN run, since it wouldn't be using https, but I was going by the RC Wiki page: http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/wiki/Dev_SVN Any reason to use the https way vs a basic svn up? Thanks for the feedback Jon. P > > On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, phil wrote: >> Consider this a work in progress, but here is the latest script I'm > using to pull the latest RC from SVN nightly: >> >> http://fak3r.com/articles/2006/05/31/roundcube-webmail-update-script -- http://fak3r.com - you don't have to kick it
