On Thu, 1 Jun 2006, phil wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 14:12:49 -0400 (EDT), Jon Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not "svn update"? It takes puts less bandwidth on both
servers, and runs much quicker.
So sure, it would remove the need to press 'p' on the first SVN run, since it
wouldn't be using https, but I was going by the RC Wiki page:
http://trac.roundcube.net/trac.cgi/wiki/Dev_SVN
No. It uses the same URL as the first run (and you still have to
do a 'svn checkout' once), but since you already checked it out once, it
doesn't have to get every file, but instead just the stuff that has
changed since your last update.
Any reason to use the https way vs a basic svn up?
Hopefully this isn't an insult, but have you used subversion
before? I don't understand the question.
