till wrote: > I have no objections against Swiftmailer, I just don't know it well. :-) > > I guess if people see a general "error" in the current code we use, > the PEAR people are generally very open to patches and improvements (I > know first hand).
Did someone sent them an "attachments streaming" patch from http://public.lanl.gov/jbarbuc/patches/roundcube/ ? > We are also looking into ezComponents' mail classes for the imap > backend, and maybe offering a more flexible approach to "accessing" > your email (for example through Maildir, Mbox etc.). I think imap backend is no big problem, bigger problem is messages parsing. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak http://alec.pl gg:2275252 LAN Management System Developer http://lms.org.pl Roundcube Webmail Developer http://roundcube.net _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
