On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:32 PM, A.L.E.C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > till wrote: > >> I have no objections against Swiftmailer, I just don't know it well. :-) >> >> I guess if people see a general "error" in the current code we use, >> the PEAR people are generally very open to patches and improvements (I >> know first hand). > > Did someone sent them an "attachments streaming" patch from > http://public.lanl.gov/jbarbuc/patches/roundcube/ ?
Just done! >> We are also looking into ezComponents' mail classes for the imap >> backend, and maybe offering a more flexible approach to "accessing" >> your email (for example through Maildir, Mbox etc.). > > I think imap backend is no big problem, bigger problem is messages parsing. Well, that includes it. Till _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
