Ziba Scott wrote: > Dennis P. Nikolaenko wrote: > >> Ziba Scott wrote: >> >>> till wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Thomas Bruederli >>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> till wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I agree that we should keep this redirect. >>>>>> >>>>>> @alec If you want to avoid connections at all cost, did you try >>>>>> running an IMAP proxy to see if you can gain some there? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> Just found the link: >>>> http://www.imapproxy.org/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> We use imapproxy in production for both HORDE/IMP and RoundCube. We >>> have a proxy processes on each of our webmail servers which have >>> permission to connect to IMAP as any user. Once the webmail client >>> connects to the proxy, the proxy will hold a connection open to the imap >>> server. >>> >> Have you made any performance measurements? How many users do you >> have? How many users are simultaneously online? How many connections >> are between imapproxy and IMAP server at the same time on average and >> at maximum? >> -- >> Dennis >> >> > We haven't done any measurements on roundcube without imapproxy, and I > don't have the numbers for concurrent proxy<->imap connections (I'm > looking into that).
I don't have stats over time, but right now I'd roughly estimate 4,700 proxyd processes across 15 web servers. _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
