Ziba Scott wrote:
> Ziba Scott wrote:
>
>> Dennis P. Nikolaenko wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Ziba Scott wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> till wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 1:03 PM, Thomas Bruederli
>>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> till wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree that we should keep this redirect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> @alec If you want to avoid connections at all cost, did you try
>>>>>>> running an IMAP proxy to see if you can gain some there?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> Just found the link:
>>>>> http://www.imapproxy.org/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> We use imapproxy in production for both HORDE/IMP and RoundCube. We
>>>> have a proxy processes on each of our webmail servers which have
>>>> permission to connect to IMAP as any user. Once the webmail client
>>>> connects to the proxy, the proxy will hold a connection open to the imap
>>>> server.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Have you made any performance measurements? How many users do you
>>> have? How many users are simultaneously online? How many connections
>>> are between imapproxy and IMAP server at the same time on average and
>>> at maximum?
>>> --
>>> Dennis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> We haven't done any measurements on roundcube without imapproxy, and I
>> don't have the numbers for concurrent proxy<->imap connections (I'm
>> looking into that).
>>
>
> I don't have stats over time, but right now I'd roughly estimate 4,700
> proxyd processes across 15 web servers.
>
Thanks for the stats.
Do you have only one IMAP server or several?
--
Dennis
_______________________________________________
List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
