Cor Bosman wrote: > Do you use dovecot's deliver? I asked Timo how dovecot handles ARRIVE > and DATE sorting when creating indexes. In some situations you may have > unindexed folders (for instance, when not using deliver), and im > wondering how the difference is then. You could test this by removing > all indexes for the 7k folder you have and issuing both commands.
OK, now it's 6 sec. but I was do this first time ever. So, this will not happen very often. > Im not sure an internal date column is necessary. Most of the time > emails will appear sorted correctly when just displaying the Date: > header as you would now. Once in a while you'd get apparently > out-of-order emails (especially spam, but also emails that get delayed > on the way), but I think the user-configurable setting explains most of > that. We do this currently with squirrelmail and i rarely, if ever, get > questions about the sorting display. Squirrelmail does not display the > internaldate in the date column afaik. You think it's necessary to > display the internaldate? No, it's not necessary, and would be better to not display it, but it will be a little bit inconsistent. User is able to change sorting by clicking on column header. It's not possible with not-existent column ;) We should implement 3-state sorting switch then, asc, desc, no-sorting, and "no-sorting" means "by internaldate". -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak http://alec.pl gg:2275252 LAN Management System Developer http://lms.org.pl Roundcube Webmail Project Developer http://roundcube.net _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
