On Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:06:15 +0200, "A.L.E.C" <[email protected]> wrote: > No, it's not necessary, and would be better to not display it, but > it will be a little bit inconsistent. User is able to change sorting > by clicking on column header. It's not possible with not-existent column ;) > We should implement 3-state sorting switch then, asc, desc, no-sorting, and > "no-sorting" means "by internaldate".
My message threading patch (http://www.atomice.com/blog/?page_id=34) implements this. It adds a dummy search column called 'default'. Clicking on the Date column toggles between ascending, descending and 'default'. Like Aleksander, I found Dovecot's sorting could take several seconds with a very large mailbox (~30,000 messages). Regards, Chris _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
