> You are right. There is index_sort which I do not personally need, but > some users want and now it has been added to Roundcube - great. > > However I have one mailbox which is very large and Roundcube takes a > long > time to sort the messages in it (threaded or not). For this mailbox > I want > to just see messages in the order the server sends them back, and > not have > Roundcube sort them at all because it is too slow.
I totally agree, i have had this discussion with Alec before when I suggested to use a SORT(ARRIVAL). But Alec then had a convincing argument why it couldnt be used. Possibly this was waiting for the implemention of index_sort? In which case maybe now it can be used? Cor _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
