Cor Bosman wrote: > I totally agree, i have had this discussion with Alec before when I > suggested to use a SORT(ARRIVAL). But Alec then had a convincing > argument why it couldnt be used. Possibly this was waiting for the > implemention of index_sort? In which case maybe now it can be used?
"arrival sort" is better than implemented "index sort", but: - I'm not really sure if "SORT(ARRIVAL)" is faster than "SORT(DATE)" on every IMAP server implementation, - "arrival sort" will be very slow on servers without SORT capability (as it was before index_sort implementation). I really don't know what "arrival sort" has in common with threading. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak http://alec.pl gg:2275252 LAN Management System Developer http://lms.org.pl Roundcube Webmail Project Developer http://roundcube.net _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
