31.03.2010 11:19, A.L.E.C wrote: > Vladislav Bogdanov wrote: > >> OK, my main idea - to introduce: >> * 'groups' - which are supposed to send mail to whole 'group', >> expandable in compose fields >> * 'collections' - which are searchable for contacts but user can not >> send to a whole collection. > > Isn't collection == addressbook? Why? We don't need a new being. >
Without automatic-addressbook plugin - yes. Here is only one SQL address book (singular case). With automatic address book plugin - yes. But having separate tables for different SQL address books is bad from the design point of view IMHO. If we simply add 'addressbook_id' field to 'contacts' table (and one more table with names and flags of that address books) then we can have as many SQL address books as one may wish. Personal addresses (read/write/delete/search/group), collected addresses (read/move/delete), imported addresses (read-only), etc. etc. And all insert/delete operations whould be replaced with one SQL update operation if user wants to move address to different addressbook. Groups support would be limited to address books with 'groupable' flag set or whatever else. Vladislav _______________________________________________ List info: http://lists.roundcube.net/dev/
