Am 19.11.2012 23:04, schrieb Michael Heydekamp:
> But even more important is this issue, of course:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> b) Vice versa ("Display HTML" being enabled)
>>>
>>>> th regards to if I will reply with a HTML or a plain text message [...]
>>
>> Uh, what's this now...?!!
>>
>> The quote above is missing a lot of text between "[...] being enabled)" and
>> "th regards to [...]" The missing text is:
>>
>> " I do NOT get a link to display the text/plain part. But if this link
>> would exist, THIS could do the trick wi" This text can be seen in your
>> reply, but it's gone in my quote of your reply.
>>
>> Where the heck did this text go to? This is scaring me...
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
JFTR:
Although nobody replied to this issue explicitely, the problem seems to
have gone in the meantime. At least I can't replicate it with the current
0.9-git anymore.
I can still replicate it with 0.8.4, though. Wondering, which commit might
have (unintentionally?) fixed that.
The message related to this issue is the one of Manfred Usselmann of
19.11.2012, 08:22, in this list. A reply to this message brought up the
issue of the lost text part in the quote.
Cheers,
--
Michael Heydekamp
Co-Admin freexp.de
Düsseldorf/Germany
_______________________________________________
Roundcube Development discussion mailing list
dev@lists.roundcube.net
http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
