You can check the behavior by clicking Reply All button (not Reply List) on this message. Example message from our mailing list contains headers: To: dev@lists.roundcube.net Reply-To: dev@lists.roundcube.net From: origi...@poster.tld
So, current behavior is that you end up with one recipient dev@lists.roundcube.net in To field. Thunderbird for example, will add origi...@poster.tld in Cc field. So, the problem is related to Reply-To header handling. Poll: 1. Keep current behavior. 2. If To: and Reply-To: are the same and From: is different - add From: address to Cc field. I prefer current solution (1). Because I think that if Reply-To is defined a senders intention is to not receive replies to his From: address, no matter if Reply, Reply-All or Reply-List is used. I however understand that "private reply" to poster is sometimes wanted. -- Aleksander 'A.L.E.C' Machniak LAN Management System Developer [http://lms.org.pl] Roundcube Webmail Developer [http://roundcube.net] --------------------------------------------------- PGP: 19359DC1 @@ GG: 2275252 @@ WWW: http://alec.pl _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list dev@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
