Hello, Am 22.03.2013 11:13, schrieb A.L.E.C: > You can check the behavior by clicking Reply All button (not Reply List) > on this message. Example message from our mailing list contains headers: > To: dev@lists.roundcube.net > Reply-To: dev@lists.roundcube.net > From: origi...@poster.tld > > So, current behavior is that you end up with one recipient > dev@lists.roundcube.net in To field. Thunderbird for example, will add > origi...@poster.tld in Cc field. > > So, the problem is related to Reply-To header handling. Poll: > 1. Keep current behavior. > 2. If To: and Reply-To: are the same and From: is different - add From: > address to Cc field. > > I prefer current solution (1). Because I think that if Reply-To is > defined a senders intention is to not receive replies to his From: > address, no matter if Reply, Reply-All or Reply-List is used. I however > understand that "private reply" to poster is sometimes wanted.
With solution 1, Reply-To and Reply-All do the same for the described scenario, right? Honestly, I don't think this is a good idea. Reply-All should do what its name suggests: reply to all (except my own address). In my opinion, user mistakes like using Reply-All instead of Reply-To misleadingly are still user mistakes, and shouldn't be covered up by the MUA. Kind regards, jonas _______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list dev@lists.roundcube.net http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
