Alright, I think the first pull request is pretty much up to our specification: https://github.com/roundcube/roundcubemail/pull/109
If you find anything that I've missed, just let me know! On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:31 PM, David Deutsch <[email protected]> wrote: > > Having it again here cannot benefit the Roundcube project in any way. > > Indeed, I hope I did not make the impression that I wanted to have the > basic style discussion that has turned many mailing lists first into hot > pits of hell and then tumbleweeds. I was just trying to find a consensus to > build on and got a bit carried away trying to influence the decisionmaking > ;-) > > In the end, there are a lot of pros and cons for various ways of doing > things. The important thing is making decisions while remaining open to > change. We have come to a decision and that's what counts right now. > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:29 PM, Reindl Harald <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Am 11.09.2013 20:16, schrieb Rob Sheldon: >> > On 2013-09-11 11:06, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> >> what i personally *never* understood is why the whole world is writing >> >> one of both unreadable code-styles at all >> >> >> >> ... >> > >> > This is a 40-year-old debate over style. Having it again here cannot >> benefit the Roundcube project in any way >> >> maybe you answered to a different thread / topic as i did............ >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Roundcube Development discussion mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev >> > >
_______________________________________________ Roundcube Development discussion mailing list [email protected] http://lists.roundcube.net/mailman/listinfo/dev
