On sábado, 2 de novembro de 2013 12:15:33, Schaufler, Casey wrote: > Why do I feel like I'm missing something? > > We want kdbus to improve performance.
Yes. > Many/most/some dbus applications will require porting. Yes. > That is too much work, so we need a compatibility daemon that is going to > suck away any performance gain, and in fact probably make performance > worse. Quite possibly. > We're counting on the widespread adoption of kdbus in the future, which will > get the performance back as everyone ports everything from dbus to kdbus. Yes. > I can see kdbus as a long term plan. > > I can't image why it makes any sense at all for Tizen3. Nor I. Unless there are specific gains to be had for specific daemons that we plan on porting, I don't see the point of going ahead of upstream. > I see lots of work and a system that does not perform as well as it does > today with "real" dbus. > > Someone please tell me what I'm missing. You're missing that kdbus is still not ready for prime time. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
