It was <2013-12-20 pią 13:06>, when Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 11:33 +0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >> I'd like to ask everyone here (and please pass this request to those who >> are not yet subscribed) to take more care when you upgrade something. >> Especially if the upgraded software depends on components (kernel in >> this case) that may differ between profiles. > > I am not sure it is correct to say in this case that systemd depends on > new kernel.
Unfortunately it is the case. I admit that it is not so new change (f74bc146, 2013-11-07) and it is not an upstream change, however, it appeared in v208 tizen rpms. https://review.tizen.org/git/?p=platform/upstream/systemd.git;a=blob;f=src/core/mount-setup.c;h=71a16189f2a2f510e181feae2b3335573649b137#l91 Nevertheless the smackfstransmute parameter is not available in our 3.10 kernel. It was introduced in 3.11. I consider putting this on a branch tizen we all use somewhat unfair. > It is the Tizen security infrastructure which requires several > components to be patched, including systemd and the kernel. > > So the problem is that the security infrastructure was deployed, but the > Mobile kernel was not patched. > >> BTW. Why do we have separate kernels for IVI and mobile? > > Yes, I am the maintainer of the IVI kernel. Do you think it is possible to arrange coopetion between our kernel teams to maintain a single branch that would satisfy the needs of both Mobile and IVI to avoid problems like the one above in the future? What are your conditions for such cooperation? -- Łukasz Stelmach Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
pgpGWJw8lmoHE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
