On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 4:31 PM, Daniel Juyung Seo <[email protected]>wrote:
> This sounds ok to me. > By the way, how about naming the branch "efl-1.8" or "upstream-efl-1.8" as > efl upstream uses "efl-1.8" as its stable branch name? > We should follow the Tizen guidelines [1] here, i.e., pull EFL 'efl-1.8' branch to platform/upstream/efl 'upstream' branch (v1.8.3 tag), and git rebase upstream tizen. > And is there any plan to sync tizen efl master with efl upstream mater? > I don't think we should pull unnecessary branches. Ideally, patches from master are cherry-picked into 'tizen' if needed. -- Mikko [1] https://source.tizen.org/documentation/reference/git-build-system/upstream-package
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
