> -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of José Bollo > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 7:27 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dev] pam module for Smack > > On mar, 2014-01-14 at 20:45 +0900, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > On Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:19:43 +0200 Jussi Laako > > <[email protected]> > > said: > > > > > On 14.1.2014 4:16, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > > > > > having a "enable ssh" option on devices (when you enable developer > > > > mode) would be the best of both options. it's not on by default, > > > > but it's a simple click away. > > > > > > Just "Enable developer mode" in device settings would be fine. But I > > > wouldn't like to have a car that has ssh wide open to the world with > > > some default password or key... Nor phone either. > > > > i'm fine with that. a single simple checkbox is fine for me :) and > > agree - if enabled as a service, it should require you enter a > > password at that tome - no default passwords/accounts. perhaps limit > > sshd to only listen on usbnet and any wifi etc. networks you tags as > > "trusted". :) > > > > The check box should have a time limited effect. That means that you can > forget to uncheck it, it will uncheck itself after a while. > > The check box should also be associated to a kind of password. It is not > acceptable that a developer tool can connect to any device just because to > check box is checked. I'm not saying that a password must be set but that a > password can be set if wanted. > > Best regards > José
Even having the sshd binary on a production device is criminally insane. On a developer device, fine. Something connected to Verizon or driving down CA-1 ? No! > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
