On 01/24/2014 Karol Lewandowski wrote: >On 01/24/2014 12:02 PM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote: >> >> Le 22/01/14 20:38, Karol Lewandowski a écrit : >> To be a viable solution, kdbus will need to land in kernel official >> release in a workable model (inclusing smack support). > >Is it really the case? In tizen we are carrying quite a few patches that >weren't integrated into upstream projects. Our whole security model depends on >this (upstream dbus-daemon doesn't >support smack if I'm not mistaken).
It is certainly true for Tizen IVI for IA. We usually have 0 out of tree kernel patches. Maintaining out of tree kernel patches is too resource intensive. Regards Joel Clark _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
