Hi Max,

If you look at the Tizen:Common project in OBS (https://build.tizen.org/project/show?project=Tizen%3ACommon), you'll see that we have 4 main repos for 4 arches:
- arm-wayland/armv7l
- arm64-wayland/aarch64
- ia32-wayland/i586
- x86_64-wayland/x86_64

The extra arches in each repo are needed for cross build, but not relevant for images.

As José explained previously, currently we can't have emulator-yagl in the project because it breaks the usual images, due to a conflict with mesa.

We tried to keep emulator-yagl inside the project without any modification on the packaging but this is difficult because the same libs are provided by mesa & yagl, but not in the same format.

For example, mesa builds a binary package libgbm/libgbm-devel, which provides pkgconfig(gbm). But emulator-yagl provides directly pkgconfig(gbm). There are also implicit & direct dependencies on libgbm.so.x. So when comes the time where an image is built by mic, emulator-yagl gets pulled due to such a "direct" gbm dependency and this causes the problem at runtime. We tried to 'Prefer:' mesa over emulator-yagl but this doesn't change anything, as these settings seem to only influence the build process (which works well BTW).

As the images were badly broken (no UI), we decided to roll back to a stable situation and removed emulator-yagl, which was not an absolute requirement for Tizen:Common at this time.


So now, we can take some time and think about the best way to do things.

I see 2 ways to add the emulator images:

1) play with image configurations (.ks files) and exclude some unwanted packages depending on the image:
- exclude emulator-yagl from usual images
- exclude mesa from emulator images

Pro: no extra build (except emulator-yagl itself, which builds fine)
Cons: we have to Prefer: mesa for the whole build. This could cause some bugs at runtime in the emulator, as all packages will be built against mesa but will run with yagl. More difficult: we have to Prefer libgbm provided by mesa instead of libgbm provided by yagl => Project config is more tricky.

2) add one or two new repos:
- 'emul32-wayland' with arch i586
- 'emul64-wayland' with arch x86_64

In the project config, we can detect that we're in those 2 repos and set some extra flags like '%_with_emulator 1'. Then in all packages involved, we can test the flag for conditional build, options etc.
=> in emulator-yagl, build only if flag is set
=> in mesa: build only if flag is not set

Then we would have the usual images built against these new repos (as we do for any repo in fact).

Pro: build is cleaner
Cons: This is an extra build of the whole distro, with specific errors to fix etc. And also the emulator images don't reflect the non-emulated images (packages are not shared by both types of images)



I'd prefer the first solution, just to avoid useless builds. People who had to work with emulatro o

Any other way ?

--
Stéphane Desneux
Intel OTC - Vannes/FR
gpg:1CA35726/DFA9B0232EF80493AF2891FA24E3A2841CA35726

Yu, Max A wrote:
Hi José,

Emulator image for common should not contain mesa. Would you please kindly 
remove mesa and include emulator-yagl in it?

Thanks,
Max

-----Original Message-----
From: José Bollo [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 3:11 PM
To: Yu, Max A
Cc: Roman Kubiak; [email protected]; Stanislav Vorobiov; Graydon, Tracy; 
Esquivel, Jenna G
Subject: Re: [Dev] Common/Generic profile images usability

Hi Max,

Two weeks ago, as replacement during hollidays of Stéphane, I accepted a push 
request from emulator-yagl. It had the effect first to brake the build and when 
repaired to brake the image. So we removed the package.

 From memory, we failed to add it mainly because there is a conflict of name for libgbm. 
Both emulator-yagl and mesa are providing a package of the same name "libgbm". 
It is then impossible to prefer a package over an other...

We are planning to reintroduce it in the futur.

Your help to build it is welcome. Many repackaging it with distinct names... Or 
anything else.

Best regards
José




On mer, 2014-05-21 at 06:42 +0000, Yu, Max A wrote:
Hi,

I'd like to know who is the Release Engineer for Tizen:Common. I'm in Tizen SDK 
team and I want to have emulator image built for Tizen:Common. I have built 
emulator image for Tizen:IVI:Release for M14.1. You can see that there is a 
'emulator' repo for Tizen:IVI:Release at 
https://build.tizen.org/project/show?project=Tizen%3AIVI%3ARelease . Which 
contains the following lines in its Project Configuration:

#This solves emulators needs
%if "%_repository" == "emulator"
   Support: emulator-macros
   Prefer: emulator-yagl
%endif

I hope the RE for Tizen:Common can do the similar thing to add emulator repo. 
Please kindly let me know if you have any question.

Thanks,
Max

-----Original Message-----
From: Dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of José Bollo
Sent: Friday, May 16, 2014 3:12 PM
To: Roman Kubiak
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Dev] Common/Generic profile images usability

Hi Roman,

the emulator-yagl is removed from common because it broke the build.
We intend to provide emulator packages in common as soon as possible but we 
prefer to first fix ARM building.

Sorry for that. Maybe you can install the emulator from an other repo
but without warranty


Best regards
José

On gio, 2014-05-15 at 18:43 +0200, Roman Kubiak wrote:
I can't find that package on the common-wayland-ia32 repository:
root@10:~# zypper se emulator
Loading repository data...
Reading installed packages...

S | Name            | Summary                   | Type
--+-----------------+---------------------------+--------
   | emulator-macros | macros for emulator build | package

Is it somewhere else, my repositories on the image are default:
root@10:~# zypper lr -u
# | Alias  | Name   | Enabled | Refresh |
URI
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------------------------
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+--
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------------------------
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+--
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+---------------------------
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+--
--+--------+--------+---------+---------+-----------------
1 | common | common | Yes     | No      |
http://download.tizen.org/snapshots/tizen/common/common-wayland-ia32
/l
atest/repos/common/ia32/packages/


On 05/15/2014 05:48 PM, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:

Hi,

You're running this in qemu, right ? It looks like you're using
mesa, i.e. that Common image probably has mesa in emul image (mistakenly), you 
need to install emulator-yagl package, it should then work. But I'm not 100% 
sure that everything else will work, I have no idea what that Common image is 
and what it has inside.

On 05/15/2014 07:36 PM, Roman Kubiak wrote:
Well i can't get the DRM backend to work in wayland i tried the latest IVI-emul 
image and the latest COMMON image both for i386. Weston says (looks like a 
missing drm driver):

root@10:~# weston --tty 1
Date: 2014-05-15 PDT
[08:34:28.394] weston 1.4.0
                http://wayland.freedesktop.org/
                Bug reports to: 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Wayland&component=weston&version=1.4.0
                Build:
[08:34:28.394] OS: Linux, 3.12.18+, #4 PREEMPT Thu May 15
15:57:16 CEST 2014, i686 [08:34:28.394] Using config file 
'/etc/xdg/weston/weston.ini'
[08:34:28.395] Loading module '/usr/lib/weston/drm-backend.so'
[08:34:28.395] initializing drm backend [08:34:28.396] using
/dev/dri/card0 [08:34:28.396] Loading module
'/usr/lib/weston/gl-renderer.so'
failed to load module: /usr/lib/gbm/gbm_gallium_drm.so: cannot
open shared object file: No such file or directory
[08:34:28.396] failed to initialize egl [08:34:28.401] fatal:
failed to create compositor

But fbdev works fine.

best regards
On 05/15/2014 04:51 PM, Stanislav Vorobiov wrote:
Hi, please see below

On 05/15/2014 06:42 PM, Roman Kubiak wrote:
Helo again.

I ditched vmware due to licensing issues for now, but thank you for the help i 
know how to fix it and i understand how to get things running.

I jumped to our own emulator based on qemu (there is a very fresh piece of code 
on tizen.org). I got it to build and run the Common image, weston shows up but 
starting anything is causing a segfault in the tz-launcher process.
Though i was not able to start weston with the DRM backend,
it's running on fbdev. The VIGS/Yagl implementation in the
kernel/qemu might not be wayland ready,
Actually, VIGS/YaGL already runs wayland, you can refer to
Tizen IVI emulator, it uses tizen.org QEMU and runs Tizen IVI image. I'm not 
sure about Common, I never actually tried it.

but the FBDEV stuff seems to work fine. I don't know what
tz-launcher is doing that it's doing a segfault, i was able to start a weston 
terminal and that seems to work.

The small fix i had to do was adding the display user to the
video group. Also the kernel for the emulator needs to be
rebuilt (the default config in the emulator-kernel repo
assumes that the root disk is /dev/vda and has that
hard-coded in a minimal initramfs that builds with the
kernel)

Could someone tell me if tz-launcher might need DRM and that's why it's 
crashing or is that something else i'd need to check ?

best regards

On 05/14/2014 07:15 PM, VanCutsem, Geoffroy wrote:
Quick update:



I got the Tizen Common Weston desktop up and running under
VMware using this image:
http://download.tizen.org/releases/daily/tizen/common/comm
on -wayland-x86_64/tizen_20140513.6/



The quickest way is to modify the
/boot/extlinux/extlinux.conf file and add ‘security=none’ to the kernel 
command-line (workaround for https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/TIVI-2964), a 
more permanent workaround (but not a complete fix) would be to modify the 
kernel config to have vmwgfx built-in (instead of a module). I have also 
verified that such modifications solves the issue (and you can keep security 
turned on in that case which you really really want).



I can push a patch to have ‘vmwgfx’ built-in to Tizen Common. In general, it 
may be good to re-use some of the specific kernel configs that are described 
here also in the Tizen Common kernel:
https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/IVI/artem-kernel#Kernel_configuration (look for 
those that are documented as useful for VMware).



Geoffroy



*From:*Dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
Of *VanCutsem, Geoffroy
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2014 5:56 PM
*To:* Roman Kubiak; [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: [Dev] Common/Generic profile images
usability



Hi Roman,



If you’re interested, I used to keep some ‘recipes’ on how
to run Tizen IVI 2.0 (based on X) under VMware, it’s
described here: https://wiki.tizen.org/wiki/IVI/IVI_2.0_VMware. Back then, I 
had to provide the xorg-x11-drv-vmware driver (as you have pointed out below) 
and I also had to modify some of the build options used for mesa and libdrm. 
Feel free to take a look there if you want to get that working but as pointed 
out by Dominique, we are not focused on X in Tizen 3.0 so I’m not sure where 
this would lead you to.



A more interesting path would be to get the Wayland image
running on VMware. I have quickly looked at the kernel
used in Common and the vmwgfx driver is built as a module
which means we could be hitting
https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/TIVI-2964
<https://bugs.tizen.org/jira/browse/TIVI-2964>. I’ll see
if I can run a quick test on my side to validate this. If that’s the problem, 
you could try to turn security off (add ‘security=none’ at the kernel 
command-line) or rebuild the kernel with the ‘vmwgfx’ driver built-in.



Geoffroy



*From:*Dev [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf
Of *Roman Kubiak
*Sent:* Wednesday, May 14, 2014 4:07 PM
*To:* [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [Dev] Common/Generic profile images
usability



Just to update the Xorg image won't work either, there is only one driver 
included in the image for Xorg and that's the intel_drv.so (bit selfish i 
think) no fbdev or vmware drivers are present so Xorg will never start.
Also i can't any service in systemctl that could be some sort of a windows 
manager.

best regards
Roman Kubiak

On 05/14/2014 03:59 PM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote:


     Le 14/05/2014 15:38, Roman Kubiak a écrit :

         I got the images running before (the IVI profile) on VMware, so VMware 
itself is not an issue.
         My question was really, SHOULD I see something in the image, is there 
a UI in the common profile at all or is this a bare bones sort of OS image that 
contains no UI experience at all.

     When booting Tizen Common you should have a  test UX (basic Weston) with 
several user pre-logged on the system.
     The background show the sea and several islands.




     My question about Xorg is still not answered, what is
the UI for Xorg i should expec t to find in the common
image (is there some sort of default WM that should
launch?)

     We currently do not build a Tizen Common for X but only Wayland 32 and 64 
nits for IA and 32 bits for ARM (work in progress)
     If someone is interested to take the responsibility of building and 
maintain X Common images, thanks to speak up.

     Regards

     Dominig




     _______________________________________________

     Dev mailing list

     [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>

     https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev



--
--------------
  Roman Kubiak
--------------

Intel Corporation NV/SA
Kings Square, Veldkant 31
2550 Kontich
RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718.
Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or 
distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

Intel Corporation NV/SA
Kings Square, Veldkant 31
2550 Kontich
RPM (Bruxelles) 0415.497.718.
Citibank, Brussels, account 570/1031255/09

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential
material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or 
distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.

--
--------------
  Roman Kubiak
--------------



_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev


_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev


_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
_______________________________________________
Dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev

Reply via email to