On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 18:40 +0300, Stoppa, Igor wrote: > On 12 June 2014 18:21, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > One reason for using a remote farm is that developers do not necessarily > > have access to real test devices. Using the same hardware for different > > developers is more cost-efficient, too, in particular when those > > developers are in different time zones and not active at the same time. > > sure, it's just that the HW needs to come from somewhere :-D > both the IVIs or whatever we want to use and the servers that will > create the images. > > One more reason to search for consensus also beyond the circle of developers > ;-)
Of course. But aren't release engineering and QA also following this list? It is not the "developer" list, it is the list for "development of the Tizen platform". -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
