On Friday 25 July 2014 15:14:01 Damian Hobson-Garcia wrote: > I agree that mesa shouldn't be changing their ABI, but if I have a > platform that never has and never will use Mesa drivers, why do I care > what they do with their ABI one way or the other? If I instead build > against something like opegl-es-virtual-drv, then its a complete > non-issue. Then nothing needs to be forced or defined, and I don't > need any extra symlinks.
The application may be compiled to also work on a different platform. Or the application simply dlopen()s the GL ES library. What's important is that it's established. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
