Hi JuWan Kim, Is that common arm-wayland image public? If so, I'd appreciate a link to the repo, so I might test build before pushing.
If that image is not public, I have no choice but to request you push the patch yourself. Our Tizen 3.0 images are in bad shape, and I'm having trouble getting a successful test build. The closest I got was by building against our IVI repo, but it is lacking the automake package, which is needed during the build process for aclocal. I'm left with nowhere I can test to ensure OBS will be able to build the updated package successfully. Best, -Brad On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 12:21 AM, 김주완 <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Brad, > > > > I tested your patches in common arm-wayland image ( not latest ). > > I installed buxton-rpm in target(Odoird U3) and pushed libbuxtonsimple.so > manually. > > and I confirmed that bxt_hello_simple is worked well. > > I think that your patch is no problem. > > > > Best Regards, > > JuWan Kim > > ------- *Original Message* ------- > > *Sender* : Peters, Brad T<[email protected]> > > *Date* : 2014-09-12 05:41 (GMT+09:00) > > *Title* : Re: Re: [Dev] [Buxton] buxton upgrade > > > Hi JuWan, Semun, > > Could one of you test the attached patches against a 3.0 ARM build? > As I had mentioned previously in discussion with Semun, I do not have > access > to such an image. > > I've done a little porting to ensure these patches will apply cleanly to > tizen.org : platform/upstream/buxton. I had updated the tizen.org Buxton > project to the upstream 3.0 release just a few weeks back. Since these > patches > are not in a release, we'll just need to carry the patches in OBS. Please > see > attached. > > Best regards, > -Brad Peters > > > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 7:11 PM, 김주완 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's ok. I just had thought that you are not interested in that issue. >> >> Ok, now, I hope that the merge of simple interface will be done today as >> you said. >> >> and I am wondering what the simple notification. >> >> Could you please exlain what the concept is? >> >> We are interested in changeing vconf to buxton easily and hope that >> the all change will be done in the very near future. >> >> so, I am wondering that you have a due date for this work. >> >> The expression, "when ready", is not clear. >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> JuWan Kim >> >> >> >> ------- *Original Message* ------- >> >> *Sender* : Peters, Brad T<[email protected]> >> >> *Date* : 2014-09-10 08:09 (GMT+09:00) >> >> *Title* : Re: [Dev] [Buxton] buxton upgrade >> >> >> I apologize for the delayed response; I've been out on medical leave for >> most of the past week. >> >> Thanks for noticing this - I had thought the Simple interface was already >> merged. I'll do so first thing tomorrow >> >> There's also an expanded Simple interface currently being worked; that >> will enable simple notifications, such >> that the Buxton interface is as easy to use as the vconf API. That's >> probably a week off still, but I'll merge >> that when ready. >> >> Best regards, >> -Brad Peters >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 6:34 PM, 김주완 <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Brad, >>> >>> I saw the simple buxton library in upstream. >>> https://github.com/sofar/buxton/blob/master/src/include/buxtonsimple.h >>> >>> Do you have any plan to merge it ? >>> Simple library will be helpful to convert vconf to buxton. >>> >>> BRs, >>> JuWan Kim. >> >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
