On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 15:53 +0100, Dominig ar Foll wrote: > Le 15/12/2014 15:11, ronan a écrit : > > If it's OK for every one I'm going to merge the review 32000 into > > meta-tizen. > > > Sorry, but I would rather stick to the Yocto model as being able to boot > on a reduce file system is a real value add. > Backward compatibility with old non standard hard-wired path in Tizen > can always be enable via a simple link in Tizen. > Obviously the correct use of the rpm macro is to be preferred.
No doubt about that. However, we need to walk before we can fly. Using the proposed path change would get us moving. Adapting Tizen .spec files to be more path-independent or enabling new use cases (like booting with a reduced file system) then can follow later. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
