Hi Dominiq, I think it's not good idea because she and our team don't have the device and have a little knowledge about Intel architecture. Like our team is focusing the tizen on arm machine and arm architecture, you would do much efforts for x86 architecture. As you know, we can't verify all of the architectures. IMHO that's why we work together. I hope your team also participates in this deviced development :)
Best Regards, Chanho Park > -----Original Message----- > From: Dev [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dominig ar > Foll (Intel OTC) > Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2014 6:44 PM > To: Jiyoung Yun > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Dev] Deviced merge into Tizen:Common > > Le 20/12/2014 09:58, Jiyoung Yun a écrit : > > > > Okay, thank you for your advice. > > > > I already tested it on common based on arm repo. > > And I will try to test it in ivi side but it takes some times. > > Just try on Common with an IA HW (preferably 64 bits) like the > Minnowboard Max or a Baytrail NUC. > It's a lot easier for you and that will do. > > Regards > > > Dominig ar Foll > Senior Software Architect > Open Source Technology Centre > Intel SSG > > > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
