On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 5:11 AM, Chanho Park <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dominiq, > > I think it's not good idea because she and our team don't have the device > and have a little knowledge about Intel architecture. Like our team is > focusing the tizen on arm machine and arm architecture, you would do much > efforts for x86 architecture. As you know, we can't verify all of the > architectures. IMHO that's why we work together. I hope your team also > participates in this deviced development :) > > The point is that the configuration of deviced you are submitting to Tizen:Common needs to be such that it works by default on a 'generic HW'. The default configuration cannot have dependencies to LED/vibra/battery charger etc. Before getting deviced accepted, it needs to be verified that it builds and runs as expected on IA too. -- Mikko
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
