On 06/05/2015 04:14 PM, Dominig ar Foll (Intel OTC) wrote: > Centre Intel SSG > Le 05/06/2015 01:59, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) a écrit : >> On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 14:09:03 +0300 Leon Anavi >> <[email protected]> said: >> >>> >> good q. is zypper an integral part of tizen? from the view of >> someonme on a >> tizen system who wants to add a package - eg a debugger to get work >> done... it >> is. > Zypper is not part of Tizen compliance and as Yocto does not use > Zypper is quite logical not to have it. > Model with Yoco is that you do an image for what you need, not a base > image where you add later Package from a repo. > While it could be done, it"s certainly not coming by default.
my question is more one of "maybe it should be there by default as a core part of tizen?" as it has key value to tizen as an OS. it makes tizen useful. it differentiates tizen. it makes an installed tizen device EASY to extend as a developer of that device or as someone interested in augmmenting it. >> >> also - is smack a required thing in tizen. sure- adds security, but >> is it a >> hard dep - no smack, then it's not tizen? > I can confirm that pint, no Smack, no Tizen. > My advise is to reactivate Smack ASAP as making it at the end of the > project would be more than a serious pain. > Believe me, we tried :-( so saying.. smack -> pain. ? :) /me looks around for casey... -- The above message is intended solely for the named addressee and may contain trade secret, industrial technology or privileged and confidential information otherwise protected under applicable law including the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, copying or use of the information contained in this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender by email and delete this communication immediately. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.tizen.org/listinfo/dev
