I can see this being very helpful in the testing of the RC, if we can get
it in.
Even if it is only a partial usecase to test that we can document as part
of the RC announcement that would give new testers something to immediately
standup and test.
That said, I would timebox this so that we can turn the crank and get the
release machinery working again within the next week or so.

Thoughts?

On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 7:37 PM Sumit Kumar <ksu...@apache.org> wrote:

> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-969 aims to make developer
> productivity better by making it easier to develop and test locally in an
> integrated environment using docker and docker-compose. May be not everyone
> would benefit from this immediately if they are not comfortable with docker
> ecosystem. I'm in favor of making progress, so may be we shouldn't block
> just for this? How about we cut an RC and see how things go? If I'm able to
> catch up the train, great; if not, we will march ahead without it?
>
>
>
>
>
> ---- On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:25:35 -0700 larry mccay <larry.mc...@gmail.com>
> wrote ---
>
>
>
> Is this a release blocker for 0.8.0, @Sumit Kumar <mailto:
> ksu...@apache.org> ?
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:34 PM Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I was able to complete the dependency task LIVY-593 but I'm yet to make
> > progress on LIVY-969, this may take another week or two.
> >
> >
> >
> > ---- On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:07:00 -0700 *larry mccay
> > <mailto:larry.mc...@gmail.com <mailto:larry.mc...@gmail.com>>* wrote
> ---
> >
> > Hi @Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> -
> >
> > Thanks for the response!
> > I believe that @Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org> spoke up and is
> asking to
> > wait for an PR to be included LIVY-969.
> > We should check on the status of that first.
> >
> > @Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org> ?
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 1:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:
> j...@nanthrax.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > yes, I think it's good time to prepare a new Livy release, it would be
> > > also a great message to the community.
> > >
> > > I can do a pass and prepare it.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 2:47 PM larry mccay <mailto:lmc...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > All -
> > > >
> > > > I've noted that the majority of the open JIRA items for 0.8.0 have
> > been
> > > > resolved.
> > > > There are a couple that I have moved out to 0.9.0 and a couple still
> > > > waiting for responses that may be moved out unless they are
> considered
> > > > blockers.
> > > >
> > > > At this point, we are looking ~35 total JIRAs in this release:
> > > > Full List:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-975?jql=project%20%3D%20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.0
> > > >
> > > > With a handful of process and doc related items remaining:
> > > >
> > > > Remaining:
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-969?jql=project%20%3D%20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)
> >
> > > >
> > > > We've addressed a number of dependency CVEs but have a ways to go to
> > get
> > > > rid of all of the Critical and High severity items. This will need
> to
> > > > continue into 0.9.0 and beyond (as they just keep on coming).
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to target getting a release candidate for 0.8.0 by the end
> of
> > > next
> > > > week.
> > > > If someone would like to step up as Release Manager for this release
> > > please
> > > > feel free to say so.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts, concerns(, jokes)?
> > > >
> > > > thanks,
> > > >
> > > > --larry
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >

Reply via email to