+1, it makes sense to have a milestone target.

I would move forward with a release "as it is" as it would be a good
message to community.

Regards
JB

On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 7:09 PM larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> I can see this being very helpful in the testing of the RC, if we can get
> it in.
> Even if it is only a partial usecase to test that we can document as part
> of the RC announcement that would give new testers something to immediately
> standup and test.
> That said, I would timebox this so that we can turn the crank and get the
> release machinery working again within the next week or so.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 7:37 PM Sumit Kumar <ksu...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-969 aims to make developer
> > productivity better by making it easier to develop and test locally in an
> > integrated environment using docker and docker-compose. May be not everyone
> > would benefit from this immediately if they are not comfortable with docker
> > ecosystem. I'm in favor of making progress, so may be we shouldn't block
> > just for this? How about we cut an RC and see how things go? If I'm able to
> > catch up the train, great; if not, we will march ahead without it?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---- On Tue, 30 May 2023 16:25:35 -0700 larry mccay <larry.mc...@gmail.com>
> > wrote ---
> >
> >
> >
> > Is this a release blocker for 0.8.0, @Sumit Kumar <mailto:
> > ksu...@apache.org> ?
> >
> > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 12:34 PM Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I was able to complete the dependency task LIVY-593 but I'm yet to make
> > > progress on LIVY-969, this may take another week or two.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---- On Tue, 30 May 2023 08:07:00 -0700 *larry mccay
> > > <mailto:larry.mc...@gmail.com <mailto:larry.mc...@gmail.com>>* wrote
> > ---
> > >
> > > Hi @Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:jbono...@apache.org> -
> > >
> > > Thanks for the response!
> > > I believe that @Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org> spoke up and is
> > asking to
> > > wait for an PR to be included LIVY-969.
> > > We should check on the status of that first.
> > >
> > > @Sumit Kumar <mailto:ksu...@apache.org> ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 1:59 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <mailto:
> > j...@nanthrax.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > yes, I think it's good time to prepare a new Livy release, it would be
> > > > also a great message to the community.
> > > >
> > > > I can do a pass and prepare it.
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 2:47 PM larry mccay <mailto:lmc...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > All -
> > > > >
> > > > > I've noted that the majority of the open JIRA items for 0.8.0 have
> > > been
> > > > > resolved.
> > > > > There are a couple that I have moved out to 0.9.0 and a couple still
> > > > > waiting for responses that may be moved out unless they are
> > considered
> > > > > blockers.
> > > > >
> > > > > At this point, we are looking ~35 total JIRAs in this release:
> > > > > Full List:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-975?jql=project%20%3D%20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.0
> > > > >
> > > > > With a handful of process and doc related items remaining:
> > > > >
> > > > > Remaining:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LIVY-969?jql=project%20%3D%20LIVY%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%200.8.0%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20Reopened)
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > We've addressed a number of dependency CVEs but have a ways to go to
> > > get
> > > > > rid of all of the Critical and High severity items. This will need
> > to
> > > > > continue into 0.9.0 and beyond (as they just keep on coming).
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to target getting a release candidate for 0.8.0 by the end
> > of
> > > > next
> > > > > week.
> > > > > If someone would like to step up as Release Manager for this release
> > > > please
> > > > > feel free to say so.
> > > > >
> > > > > Thoughts, concerns(, jokes)?
> > > > >
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > >
> > > > > --larry
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >

Reply via email to