That is true, but I was under the impression that this will be implemented with Akka (maybe because it is mentioned in the design doc).
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:21 AM Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Meisam Fathi <meisam.fa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I do agree that actor based design is cleaner and more maintainable. But > we > > had to discard it because it adds more dependencies to Livy. > > I've been reading "actor system" as a design pattern, not as > introducing a new dependency to Livy. > > If the document is actually proposing using Akka (instead of just > using Akka as an example of an actor system implementation), then I'm > a -1 on that. > > -- > Marcelo >
