yes, it is going to be Akka if moving forward (at least not going to introduce an actor framework to livy)
On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Meisam Fathi <[email protected]> wrote: > That is true, but I was under the impression that this will be implemented > with Akka (maybe because it is mentioned in the design doc). > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:21 AM Marcelo Vanzin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Meisam Fathi <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > I do agree that actor based design is cleaner and more maintainable. > But > > we > > > had to discard it because it adds more dependencies to Livy. > > > > I've been reading "actor system" as a design pattern, not as > > introducing a new dependency to Livy. > > > > If the document is actually proposing using Akka (instead of just > > using Akka as an example of an actor system implementation), then I'm > > a -1 on that. > > > > -- > > Marcelo > > >
