It does really make sense to release the 0.6.0 and start the 0.7.0-SNAPSHOT given the recent clean up that was made.
The 0.6.0 release was started 10 months ago and it's time for a stable release in anticipation of the upcoming Spark 2.4. Best Regards, On 07/11/2018 22:59, Bikas Saha wrote: > It makes sense to wait for those PRs to be merged. > > Bikas > > ________________________________ > From: Marcelo Vanzin <van...@cloudera.com.INVALID> > Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2018 12:01 PM > To: dev@livy.incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: New Livy release > > I don't think the JDBC part is ready for prime time yet. > > At the very least the following PRs need to be merged: > - > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dlivy_pull_117&d=DwIFAg&c=2w5q_42kFG40MI2alLPgJw&r=R8lliU6MvJkmSrhIl9IYEn3PxiKTyx5QGHNHOPuQ8U8&m=D2aQgkKIIFYKYBRxOc7J4PSGEc9KQXxDO6Fv-yuWLd8&s=wArjrQ0TZtfkQa87XnUAasm0AduXgYQYrDRDU3d_dUU&e= > (haven't had the > time to go back to it) > - > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_incubator-2Dlivy_pull_118&d=DwIFAg&c=2w5q_42kFG40MI2alLPgJw&r=R8lliU6MvJkmSrhIl9IYEn3PxiKTyx5QGHNHOPuQ8U8&m=D2aQgkKIIFYKYBRxOc7J4PSGEc9KQXxDO6Fv-yuWLd8&s=TOq4iiPi918ekFKcaGuWzt0Ph1y_-o23aAeXjCDxIhY&e= > > Now if you leave the JDBC part disabled in the binary packages, that > should be fine. > > On Wed, Nov 7, 2018 at 10:46 AM Bikas Saha <bi...@apache.org> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Given the Apache Spark 2.4 release and the resolution of LIVY-518, should we >> trigger the next Apache Livy release so users have Spark 2.4 support. This >> would also provide the first release vehicle for the JDBC support we >> recently added. >> >> Thoughts? >> Bikas >> > > -- > Marcelo > As a recipient of an email from Talend, your contact personal data will be on our systems. Please see our contacts privacy notice at Talend, Inc. <https://www.talend.com/contacts-privacy-policy/>
