+1 , I'm looking forward to it,I'm from DiDi, livy has been widely used in
DiDi, HA will greatly improve the stability of livy
> 在 2019年12月12日,上午11:30,Yiheng Wang <yihe...@gmail.com> 写道:
>
> Dear Community
>
> I'd like to call a vote on LIVY-718
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/issues/LIVY-718> "Support
> multi-active high availability in Livy".
>
> Currently, Livy only supports single node recovery. This is not sufficient
> in some production environments. In our scenario, the Livy server serves
> many notebook and JDBC services. We want to make Livy service more
> fault-tolerant and scalable.
>
> There're already some proposals in the community for high availability. But
> they're not so complete or just for active-standby high availability. So we
> propose a multi-active high availability design to achieve the following
> goals:
>
> - One or more servers will serve the client requests at the same time.
> - Sessions are allocated among different servers.
> - When one node crashes, the affected sessions will be moved to other
> active services.
>
> Please find the design doc here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bD3qYZpw14_NuCcSGUOfqQ0pqvSbCQsOLFuZp26Ohjc/edit?usp=sharing>,
> which has been reviewed for several weeks.
>
> This vote is open until next Wednesday (Dec. 18).
>
> [] +1: Accept the proposal
> [] +0
> [] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ...
>
> Thank you
>
> Yiheng