+1 , I'm looking forward to it,I'm from DiDi, livy has been widely used in 
DiDi,  HA  will greatly improve the stability of livy
 
> 在 2019年12月12日,上午11:30,Yiheng Wang <yihe...@gmail.com> 写道:
> 
> Dear Community
> 
> I'd like to call a vote on LIVY-718
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/issues/LIVY-718> "Support
> multi-active high availability in Livy".
> 
> Currently, Livy only supports single node recovery. This is not sufficient
> in some production environments. In our scenario, the Livy server serves
> many notebook and JDBC services. We want to make Livy service more
> fault-tolerant and scalable.
> 
> There're already some proposals in the community for high availability. But
> they're not so complete or just for active-standby high availability. So we
> propose a multi-active high availability design to achieve the following
> goals:
> 
>   - One or more servers will serve the client requests at the same time.
>   - Sessions are allocated among different servers.
>   - When one node crashes, the affected sessions will be moved to other
>   active services.
> 
> Please find the design doc here
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bD3qYZpw14_NuCcSGUOfqQ0pqvSbCQsOLFuZp26Ohjc/edit?usp=sharing>,
> which has been reviewed for several weeks.
> 
> This vote is open until next Wednesday (Dec. 18).
> 
> [] +1: Accept the proposal
> [] +0
> [] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ...
> 
> Thank you
> 
> Yiheng

Reply via email to