Hi All Thanks for participating in the vote. Here's the result: +1 (binding) ajbozarth zjffdu mgaido91 jerryshao
+1 (no-binding) 5 The vote passes. I will create subtasks for it. Thanks Yiheng On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:30 AM Yiheng Wang <yihe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear Community > > I'd like to call a vote on LIVY-718 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/LIVY/issues/LIVY-718> "Support > multi-active high availability in Livy". > > Currently, Livy only supports single node recovery. This is not sufficient > in some production environments. In our scenario, the Livy server serves > many notebook and JDBC services. We want to make Livy service more > fault-tolerant and scalable. > > There're already some proposals in the community for high availability. > But they're not so complete or just for active-standby high availability. > So we propose a multi-active high availability design to achieve the > following goals: > > - One or more servers will serve the client requests at the same time. > - Sessions are allocated among different servers. > - When one node crashes, the affected sessions will be moved to other > active services. > > Please find the design doc here > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bD3qYZpw14_NuCcSGUOfqQ0pqvSbCQsOLFuZp26Ohjc/edit?usp=sharing>, > which has been reviewed for several weeks. > > This vote is open until next Wednesday (Dec. 18). > > [] +1: Accept the proposal > [] +0 > [] -1: I don't think this is a good idea because ... > > Thank you > > Yiheng >
