OK, thanks.

I just made an updated to the POM to allow building to proceed a little
further with Java 9 as the JDK. Has anyone managed to run a whole build on
Java 9?

Gary

On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 5:24 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Log4j-perf, log4j-samples, log4j-distribution, log4j-core-its.
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jun 18, 2017, at 4:27 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > What modules are not supposed to make it to Maven Central?
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Ralph Goers <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I have modified the Java 9 support yet again. I was having a problem
> with
> >> a Maven plugin I am building where the Maven annotation processor was
> >> failing because it was finding a Java 9 class that it couldn’t read. To
> fix
> >> this I have separated the Java 9 support to its own module and then am
> >> overlaying that into the log4j-api jar as a multi-release jar. One
> benefit
> >> of this is that the Java 9 code can now be tested in the build as that
> one
> >> module uses Java 9 for compilation and testing.
> >>
> >> While doing this I was having a terrible time getting the multi-release
> >> jar to work and in the process I was able to narrow down the stack
> locator
> >> code to just a single class.  However, when I run mvn surefire:test
> >> -Dtest=StackLocatorTest in java9 it is not selecting the Java 9 version
> of
> >> the class. But I created a main program and ran that and it did select
> the
> >> correct class, so I am not sure what the problem is and I have already
> >> spent two days trying to debug it.
> >>
> >> I also added the deploy plugin with skip set to true for the java9
> module
> >> so it wouldn’t go to Nexus. While I was at it I added the same thing for
> >> the other modules that aren’t supposed to go to Maven central.
> >>
> >> In addition to making my plugin work this should also make it easier to
> >> edit the Java 9 classes in your IDE. I know it helped me in IntelliJ.
> >>
> >> Please let me know if you find any issues.
> >>
> >> Ralph
> >>
>
>
>

Reply via email to