The code as is should be ready for source and binary artifacts I believe. I
don't recall if there was a distribution zip task already set up, though,
and I believe that's the minimal required artifacts for an Apache release.

On 6 July 2017 at 17:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I attempted a release, and we fixed something, but I was still unsure as
> to
> > how to build the website as the site:stage goal fails with missing file
> > errors if I recall correctly. Since then, I've been busy with a short
> term
> > work project eating up all my energy, so I haven't had a chance to make
> > another rc, though without the site, it's not really a release now is it?
> > :/
> >
>
> Well, strictly speaking, Apache delivers sources (see Subversion), binaries
> and site? Pft! A mere convenience! Just JOKING of course. Putting our jars
> in Maven Central is a must these days.
>
> Gary
>
> >
> > On 6 July 2017 at 15:35, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > Don’t we still need to get Scala integrated into the web site? Can we
> do
> > > that before the 2.9 release? Or has a Scala release not been done yet?
> > >
> > > Ralph
> > >
> > > > On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I think that the 11.0 release of the Scala API should only be
> what
> > > we currently have in 2.8.2 plus Scala 2.12 support plus the already
> > > implemented ThreadContext wrapper in LOG4J2-1690.
> > > >
> > > > Basically just release what we currently have in the
> > logging-log4j-scala
> > > Git repo.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2017-07-05 23:28, Matt Sicker wrote:
> > > >> So 11.0 would have the old name, and 12.0 would have the new name?
> > That
> > > would be fine with me. That also gives us an opportunity to look into
> > > >> Scalameta for simpler macro portability going forward considering I
> > keep
> > > >> seeing deprecation warnings all over the place in the existing macro
> > > API.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to