I won't be able to help out with that until next week at the earliest. I'm
preparing a presentation this weekend (coincidentally one about Scala
actually), but things are starting to simmer down finally.

On 7 July 2017 at 13:39, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:

> It would be good if you could finalize the release of logging-log4j-scala.
> I am ready to help.
>
>
> On 2017-07-07 01:04, Matt Sicker wrote:
>
>> The code as is should be ready for source and binary artifacts I believe.
>> I
>> don't recall if there was a distribution zip task already set up, though,
>> and I believe that's the minimal required artifacts for an Apache release.
>>
>> On 6 July 2017 at 17:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:31 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I attempted a release, and we fixed something, but I was still unsure as
>>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>> how to build the website as the site:stage goal fails with missing file
>>>> errors if I recall correctly. Since then, I've been busy with a short
>>>>
>>> term
>>>
>>>> work project eating up all my energy, so I haven't had a chance to make
>>>> another rc, though without the site, it's not really a release now is
>>>> it?
>>>> :/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Well, strictly speaking, Apache delivers sources (see Subversion),
>>> binaries
>>> and site? Pft! A mere convenience! Just JOKING of course. Putting our
>>> jars
>>> in Maven Central is a must these days.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 6 July 2017 at 15:35, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Don’t we still need to get Scala integrated into the web site? Can we
>>>>>
>>>> do
>>>
>>>> that before the 2.9 release? Or has a Scala release not been done yet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 6, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I think that the 11.0 release of the Scala API should only be
>>>>>>
>>>>> what
>>>
>>>> we currently have in 2.8.2 plus Scala 2.12 support plus the already
>>>>> implemented ThreadContext wrapper in LOG4J2-1690.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically just release what we currently have in the
>>>>>>
>>>>> logging-log4j-scala
>>>>
>>>>> Git repo.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2017-07-05 23:28, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So 11.0 would have the old name, and 12.0 would have the new name?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> That
>>>>
>>>>> would be fine with me. That also gives us an opportunity to look into
>>>>>
>>>>>> Scalameta for simpler macro portability going forward considering I
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> keep
>>>>
>>>>> seeing deprecation warnings all over the place in the existing macro
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> API.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to