It looks fine.
The problem is that Android developers who get a transitive dependency
to log4j-api now explicitly have to exclude it, and include
log4j-api-android instead.
It is not hard to do, but how do we reach out to those Android
developers who might not even know what Log4j is (and don't care much
about logging)?
On 2017-07-10 22:49, Ralph Goers wrote:
On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:48 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
On Jul 10, 2017, at 1:25 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
Exactly. It would be better with a log4j-api that works on Android and then a
log4j-android module as an alternative to log4j-core.
I would suggest you look at log4j-api-android. It should provide a working
implementation of the API on Android. I really don’t see the point of doing
much more than this on a phone.
This is on the android branch.
Ralph
