Can you try changing the Scala version in build.sbt to 2.11.8 or 2.10.6?
Those only require Java 6 btw.

On 20 July 2017 at 16:58, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:

> Here is the JVM dump, not that we can do anything about it! :-P
>
> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/garydgregory/
> 1e8d78d6305fe5379efccf76fadf0b25/raw/1411977cea9a14328f17ff99f35bfc
> 951c1eb1c0/javacore.20170720.133045.13856.0004.txt
>
> Gary
>
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > In installed SBT and ran: 'sbt clean run' and it hangs hard with IBM
> Java,
> > CTRL-C does nothing: https://pastebin.com/HWYniJXB
> >
> > Gary
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> The sbt script is just added for convenience in case you don't have sbt
> >> installed already. Regardless, sbt has to download itself as it is
> similar
> >> to gradle's wrapper.
> >>
> >> On 20 July 2017 at 14:38, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > You could install SBT on your Windows machine, and build/run the
> project
> >> > without using the "sbt" script in Matt's repo.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.scala-sbt.org/0.13/docs/Installing-sbt-on-Windows.html
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On 2017-07-20 21:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Matt,
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm on Windows, so that sbt script is not going to work for me.
> >> >>
> >> >> I did try it on Cygwin but no dice (unsurprisingly):
> >> >>
> >> >> $ ./sbt run
> >> >> ./sbt: line 5: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> : invalid option nameipefail
> >> >> ./sbt: line 7: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 10: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 16: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 18: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 23: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 26: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_new
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_explicit_version
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`trace_level
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`debugUs
> >> >> ./sbt: line 31: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_launch_repo
> >> >> ./sbt: line 35: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`residual_args
> >> >> ./sbt: line 38: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ': not a valid identifier`extra_sbt_opts
> >> >> ./sbt: line 41: $'\r': command not found
> >> >> ./sbt: line 47: syntax error near unexpected token `$'{\r''
> >> >> '/sbt: line 47: `onSbtRunnerExit() {
> >> >>
> >> >> I don't want to take the time to set up a VirtualBox for Linux today,
> >> >> sorry
> >> >> :-(
> >> >>
> >> >> Gary
> >> >>
> >> >> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> https://github.com/jvz/test-log4j-scala
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Clone this and run "sbt run" or "./sbt run". It should print out a
> >> single
> >> >>> info-level "Hello, world!" log message.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 20 July 2017 at 14:03, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I can write a test project that you can try out with the IBM JDK.
> I'll
> >> >>>> push something to GitHub this afternoon.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On 20 July 2017 at 13:59, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]
> >
> >> >>>>> wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> On 2017-07-20 03:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I noticed WARNINGs like:
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> [INFO] --- scala-maven-plugin:3.2.2:compile (default) @
> >> >>>>>>> log4j-api-scala_2.11 ---
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  Expected all dependencies to require Scala version:
> >> 2.11.8
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api-scala_2.11:11.0
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> requires
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> scala version: 2.11.8
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang:scala-reflect:2.11.8 requires scala
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> version:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> 2.11.8
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalatest:scalatest_2.11:3.0.0 requires scala
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> version:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> 2.11.8
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalactic:scalactic_2.11:3.0.0 requires scala
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> version:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> 2.11.8
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang.modules:scala-xml_2.11:1.0.5 requires
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> scala
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> version: 2.11.7
> >> >>>>>>> [WARNING] Multiple versions of scala libraries detected!
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I have seen this too. It is hard to avoid, and I am quite
> confident
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> that
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> it is harmless.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.scala:59:
> >> >>>>>>> warning: Variable user.getName undefined in comment for class
> >> Logger
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> in
> >> >>>
> >> >>>> class Logger
> >> >>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName} with
> birthday
> >> >>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
> >> >>>>>>>                                       ^
> >> >>>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
> >> >>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.scala:59:
> >> >>>>>>> warning: Variable user.calcBirthday undefined in comment for
> class
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Logger
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> in class Logger
> >> >>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName} with
> birthday
> >> >>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
> >> >>>>>>>
> >>    ^
> >> >>>>>>> two warnings found
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> Those warnings are bogus and definitely harmless.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> The build goes on and eventually crashes the IBM JVM:
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I have not seen and such crash. Does it crash Oracle JVM too, or
> >> only
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> IBM?
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>> I haven't tried IBM JVM for this.
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>>>> Only IBM. My review states "Building it worked for me from the src
> >> zip
> >> >>>>> with
> >> >>>>> 'mvn clean install site'." and just below that I show the 'mvn
> >> >>>>> -version'
> >> >>>>> output which includes the Oracle JVM version.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Gary
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> --
> >> >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> --
> >> >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to