I can write a test project that you can try out with the IBM JDK. I'll push something to GitHub this afternoon.
On 20 July 2017 at 13:59, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 2017-07-20 03:16, Gary Gregory wrote: > > > >> I noticed WARNINGs like: > >> > >> [INFO] --- scala-maven-plugin:3.2.2:compile (default) @ > >> log4j-api-scala_2.11 --- > >> [WARNING] Expected all dependencies to require Scala version: 2.11.8 > >> [WARNING] org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j-api-scala_2.11:11.0 requires > >> scala version: 2.11.8 > >> [WARNING] org.scala-lang:scala-reflect:2.11.8 requires scala version: > >> 2.11.8 > >> [WARNING] org.scalatest:scalatest_2.11:3.0.0 requires scala version: > >> 2.11.8 > >> [WARNING] org.scalactic:scalactic_2.11:3.0.0 requires scala version: > >> 2.11.8 > >> [WARNING] org.scala-lang.modules:scala-xml_2.11:1.0.5 requires scala > >> version: 2.11.7 > >> [WARNING] Multiple versions of scala libraries detected! > >> > > > > I have seen this too. It is hard to avoid, and I am quite confident that > > it is harmless. > > > > > > C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\ > >> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.scala:59: > >> warning: Variable user.getName undefined in comment for class Logger in > >> class Logger > >> * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName} with birthday > >> ${user.calcBirthday}") > >> ^ > >> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\ > >> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.scala:59: > >> warning: Variable user.calcBirthday undefined in comment for class > Logger > >> in class Logger > >> * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName} with birthday > >> ${user.calcBirthday}") > >> ^ > >> two warnings found > >> > > > > Those warnings are bogus and definitely harmless. > > > > The build goes on and eventually crashes the IBM JVM: > >> > > > > I have not seen and such crash. Does it crash Oracle JVM too, or only > IBM? > > I haven't tried IBM JVM for this. > > > > Only IBM. My review states "Building it worked for me from the src zip with > 'mvn clean install site'." and just below that I show the 'mvn -version' > output which includes the Oracle JVM version. > > Gary > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
