I did not see a VOTE RESULT message. I'm sure Matt will get to it.

Gary

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Is this a vote thread or a discussion thread?  Was there a vote result?
>
> Ralph
>
> > On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yup, that's the plan. It doesn't save much in compile/test time on the
> main
> > repo, but it's a nice start, and it also allows us to maintain the Scala
> > API on its own which may be useful (e.g., using a Scala-specific build
> > tool).
> >
> > On 21 July 2017 at 16:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> And then, you'll remove the Scala modules from the main repo's master?
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Agreed. I'll finish this up either today or over the weekend.
> >>>
> >>> On 21 July 2017 at 07:17, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Then I don't think this should block our release.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2017-07-21 05:30, Matt Sicker wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Logged internally: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1983
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 22:22, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did find this Scala issue: https://github.com/scala/bug/
> >> issues/10417
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 22:07, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> As for the 2.12 IBM JDK bug, could be worth filing a jira ticket
> >> over
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Creating a JIRA/issue where though? In IBM's system?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Since they don't seem to publish the IBM JDK for macOS, that may
> >> make
> >>> it
> >>>>>>>> harder to test a fix, but we can possibly make a Dockerfile for
> it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 21:18, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> To test for 2.13.0, we'd need to make a 2.13.0 jar for
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> log4j-api-scala.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> You can try it out by either copying or modifying the 2.12 one and
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> changing
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> the compiler version. Using sbt, it's a bit easier to cross
> >> compile
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> various
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> versions (future goal in this repo). I'm not sure if it's such a
> >>> great
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> idea
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> to release binaries for beta versions of Scala, but if we do, I'd
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> like to
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> try out a Dotty binary as well (future Scala 3.0 compiler).
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 21:01, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> HI Matt,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.10.6 Hello, world!
> >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.11.8 Hello, world!
> >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.11.11 Hello, world!
> >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.12.1 crashes
> >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.12.0 crashes
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> How do I update the sbt file to test 2.13.0-M1?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Can you try changing the Scala version in build.sbt to 2.11.8 or
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> 2.10.6?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Those only require Java 6 btw.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 16:58, Gary Gregory <[email protected]
> >
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Here is the JVM dump, not that we can do anything about it! :-P
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/garydgregory/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1e8d78d6305fe5379efccf76fadf0b25/raw/1411977cea9a14328f17ff9
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 9f35bfc
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 951c1eb1c0/javacore.20170720.133045.13856.0004.txt
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> In installed SBT and ran: 'sbt clean run' and it hangs hard
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> IBM
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Java,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> CTRL-C does nothing: https://pastebin.com/HWYniJXB
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Matt Sicker <
> >> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> The sbt script is just added for convenience in case you
> don't
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> sbt
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> installed already. Regardless, sbt has to download itself as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> it
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> similar
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to gradle's wrapper.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 14:38, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You could install SBT on your Windows machine, and build/run
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> project
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> without using the "sbt" script in Matt's repo.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.scala-sbt.org/0.13/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs/Installing-sbt-on-Windows
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> .html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-07-20 21:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matt,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Windows, so that sbt script is not going to work
> for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did try it on Cygwin but no dice (unsurprisingly):
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ ./sbt run
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 5: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : invalid option nameipefail
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 7: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 10: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 16: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 18: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 23: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 26: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_new
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_explicit_version
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`trace_level
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`debugUs
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 31: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_launch_repo
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 35: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`residual_args
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 38: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`extra_sbt_opts
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 41: $'\r': command not found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 47: syntax error near unexpected token
> `$'{\r''
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '/sbt: line 47: `onSbtRunnerExit() {
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to take the time to set up a VirtualBox for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> today,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> sorry
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-(
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Matt Sicker <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jvz/test-log4j-scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clone this and run "sbt run" or "./sbt run". It should
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> out a
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> single
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info-level "Hello, world!" log message.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 14:03, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can write a test project that you can try out with the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IBM
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> JDK.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I'll
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> push something to GitHub this afternoon.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 13:59, Gary Gregory <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-07-20 03:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed WARNINGs like:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] --- scala-maven-plugin:3.2.2:compile
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (default) @
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> log4j-api-scala_2.11 ---
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  Expected all dependencies to require Scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -api-scala_2.11:11.0
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala version: 2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang:scala-reflect:2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> scala
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalatest:scalatest_2.11:3.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> scala
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalactic:scalactic_2.11:3.0.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> scala
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang.modules:scala-x
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ml_2.11:1.0.5
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> requires
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version: 2.11.7
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] Multiple versions of scala libraries
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen this too. It is hard to avoid, and I am
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> confident
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is harmless.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala:59:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> warning: Variable user.getName undefined in comment
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> class
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Logger
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class Logger
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> birthday
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                       ^
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala:59:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> warning: Variable user.calcBirthday undefined in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> class
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Logger
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in class Logger
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName}
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> birthday
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ^
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two warnings found
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those warnings are bogus and definitely harmless.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The build goes on and eventually crashes the IBM JVM:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not seen and such crash. Does it crash Oracle
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> too,
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> only
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IBM?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't tried IBM JVM for this.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only IBM. My review states "Building it worked for me
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> src
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> zip
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'mvn clean install site'." and just below that I show
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 'mvn
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> -version'
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output which includes the Oracle JVM version.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
>

Reply via email to