+1 from me.

This vote passes with 3 +1 votes from myself, Gary, and Mikael. I'll
continue with the release.

On 23 July 2017 at 21:10, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:

> Away from computer at the moment, but yes, I'll be taking care of this as
> soon as possible.
>
> On 23 July 2017 at 18:54, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I did not see a VOTE RESULT message. I'm sure Matt will get to it.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Is this a vote thread or a discussion thread?  Was there a vote result?
>> >
>> > Ralph
>> >
>> > > On Jul 22, 2017, at 12:56 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Yup, that's the plan. It doesn't save much in compile/test time on the
>> > main
>> > > repo, but it's a nice start, and it also allows us to maintain the
>> Scala
>> > > API on its own which may be useful (e.g., using a Scala-specific build
>> > > tool).
>> > >
>> > > On 21 July 2017 at 16:19, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> And then, you'll remove the Scala modules from the main repo's
>> master?
>> > >>
>> > >> Gary
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Agreed. I'll finish this up either today or over the weekend.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On 21 July 2017 at 07:17, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>>> Then I don't think this should block our release.
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>> On 2017-07-21 05:30, Matt Sicker wrote:
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>>> Logged internally: https://issues.apache.org/jira
>> /browse/LOG4J2-1983
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 22:22, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>> I did find this Scala issue: https://github.com/scala/bug/
>> > >> issues/10417
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 22:07, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> As for the 2.12 IBM JDK bug, could be worth filing a jira ticket
>> > >> over
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> it.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Creating a JIRA/issue where though? In IBM's system?
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>> Since they don't seem to publish the IBM JDK for macOS, that may
>> > >> make
>> > >>> it
>> > >>>>>>>> harder to test a fix, but we can possibly make a Dockerfile for
>> > it.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 21:18, Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> To test for 2.13.0, we'd need to make a 2.13.0 jar for
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> log4j-api-scala.
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> You can try it out by either copying or modifying the 2.12 one
>> and
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> changing
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> the compiler version. Using sbt, it's a bit easier to cross
>> > >> compile
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> various
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> versions (future goal in this repo). I'm not sure if it's
>> such a
>> > >>> great
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> idea
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> to release binaries for beta versions of Scala, but if we do,
>> I'd
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> like to
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> try out a Dotty binary as well (future Scala 3.0 compiler).
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 21:01, Gary Gregory <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> HI Matt,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.10.6 Hello, world!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.11.8 Hello, world!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.11.11 Hello, world!
>> > >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.12.1 crashes
>> > >>>>>>>>>>    - 2.12.0 crashes
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> How do I update the sbt file to test 2.13.0-M1?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 6:27 PM, Matt Sicker <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> Can you try changing the Scala version in build.sbt to
>> 2.11.8 or
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> 2.10.6?
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Those only require Java 6 btw.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 16:58, Gary Gregory <
>> [email protected]
>> > >
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Here is the JVM dump, not that we can do anything about it!
>> :-P
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> https://gist.githubusercontent.com/garydgregory/
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> 1e8d78d6305fe5379efccf76fadf0b
>> 25/raw/1411977cea9a14328f17ff9
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 9f35bfc
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> 951c1eb1c0/javacore.20170720.133045.13856.0004.txt
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> In installed SBT and ran: 'sbt clean run' and it hangs hard
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> with
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> IBM
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> Java,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> CTRL-C does nothing: https://pastebin.com/HWYniJXB
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Matt Sicker <
>> > >> [email protected]
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> The sbt script is just added for convenience in case you
>> > don't
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> sbt
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> installed already. Regardless, sbt has to download itself
>> as
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> it
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> is
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> similar
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> to gradle's wrapper.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 14:38, Mikael Ståldal <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You could install SBT on your Windows machine, and
>> build/run
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> project
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> without using the "sbt" script in Matt's repo.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.scala-sbt.org/0.13/
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs/Installing-sbt-on-Windows
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> .html
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-07-20 21:21, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Matt,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm on Windows, so that sbt script is not going to work
>> > for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> me.
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I did try it on Cygwin but no dice (unsurprisingly):
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $ ./sbt run
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 5: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : invalid option nameipefail
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 7: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 10: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 16: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 18: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 23: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 26: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_new
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_explicit_version
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`trace_level
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`debugUs
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 31: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`sbt_launch_repo
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 35: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`residual_args
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 38: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ': not a valid identifier`extra_sbt_opts
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 41: $'\r': command not found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ./sbt: line 47: syntax error near unexpected token
>> > `$'{\r''
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> '/sbt: line 47: `onSbtRunnerExit() {
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want to take the time to set up a VirtualBox
>> for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Linux
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> today,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> sorry
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-(
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Matt Sicker <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/jvz/test-log4j-scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Clone this and run "sbt run" or "./sbt run". It should
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> print
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> out a
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> single
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> info-level "Hello, world!" log message.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 14:03, Matt Sicker <
>> [email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can write a test project that you can try out with
>> the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IBM
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> JDK.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'll
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> push something to GitHub this afternoon.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 July 2017 at 13:59, Gary Gregory <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Ståldal <
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2017-07-20 03:16, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I noticed WARNINGs like:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [INFO] --- scala-maven-plugin:3.2.2:compile
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (default) @
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> log4j-api-scala_2.11 ---
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  Expected all dependencies to require
>> Scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.apache.logging.log4j:log4j
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -api-scala_2.11:11.0
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala version: 2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang:scala-reflect:2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalatest:scalatest_2.11:3.0.0
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scalactic:scalactic_2.11:3.0.0
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> requires
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.11.8
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING]  org.scala-lang.modules:scala-x
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ml_2.11:1.0.5
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> requires
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version: 2.11.7
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [WARNING] Multiple versions of scala libraries
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> detected!
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen this too. It is hard to avoid, and I
>> am
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quite
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> confident
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it is harmless.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logg
>> ing\log4j\scala\Logger.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala:59:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> warning: Variable user.getName undefined in comment
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> class
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Logger
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class Logger
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user ${user.getName}
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> birthday
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                                       ^
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> C:\temp\rc\apache-log4j-scala-
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 11.0-src\log4j-api-scala_2.11\
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> src\main\scala\org\apache\logging\log4j\scala\Logger.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> scala:59:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> warning: Variable user.calcBirthday undefined in
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comment
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> for
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> class
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Logger
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in class Logger
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>     * logger.debug(s"Logging in user
>> ${user.getName}
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> birthday
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>> ${user.calcBirthday}")
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    ^
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two warnings found
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those warnings are bogus and definitely harmless.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The build goes on and eventually crashes the IBM
>> JVM:
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have not seen and such crash. Does it crash
>> Oracle
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> JVM
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> too,
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> or
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> only
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IBM?
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I haven't tried IBM JVM for this.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only IBM. My review states "Building it worked for
>> me
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> the
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> src
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> zip
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'mvn clean install site'." and just below that I
>> show
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> 'mvn
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> -version'
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> output which includes the Oracle JVM version.
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Gary
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>> --
>> > >>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>>
>> > >>>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> > >>>
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>



-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to