I thought about that, but it really is a pretty minor addition - it is one class. That said, if others feel that 2.10.0 is better I am happy to accommodate.
Ralph > On Sep 11, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > It seems to me that the recent addition of the log4j-appserver module > requires a version bump to 2.10.0, not 2.9.1. > > Gary > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I still have my outstanding branch that didn't make it into 2.9.0 that's >> ready to merge, though if you're ready to do a bugfix release like that, >> I'd rather wait for that first. >> >> On 11 September 2017 at 03:43, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds good. Have we fixed all discovered regressions and new bugs in >>> 2.9.0? >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2017-09-11 09:39, Apache wrote: >>> >>>> I am thinking about doing the Log4J 2.9.1 release at the end of the week >>>> as there are a couple of bugs I'd like published by the time Java 9 is >>>> released. >>>> >>>> Ralph >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>
