I’d be OK with not publishing log4j-appserver right now but I’d prefer to leave the module in but remove it from the parent pom so that it doesn’t get built or deployed. Then I don’t think it has to be added to the release notes even though it technically is still part of the source release.
Does anyone have a problem with that? Ralph > On Sep 11, 2017, at 12:13 PM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think we should decide the versioning based on number of > classes/methods/LOC added. We should decide it based on features added. A new > feature warrants a bump in minor version, so the app server support should be > in 2.10.0. > > We could also descope the app server support for now, and release 2.9.1 > without it. I think that would be good given that we had quite some > regressions in 2.9.0. > > > On 2017-09-11 17:34, Ralph Goers wrote: >> I thought about that, but it really is a pretty minor addition - it is one >> class. That said, if others feel that 2.10.0 is better I am happy to >> accommodate. >> Ralph >>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 8:31 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> It seems to me that the recent addition of the log4j-appserver module >>> requires a version bump to 2.10.0, not 2.9.1. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I still have my outstanding branch that didn't make it into 2.9.0 that's >>>> ready to merge, though if you're ready to do a bugfix release like that, >>>> I'd rather wait for that first. >>>> >>>> On 11 September 2017 at 03:43, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sounds good. Have we fixed all discovered regressions and new bugs in >>>>> 2.9.0? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2017-09-11 09:39, Apache wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I am thinking about doing the Log4J 2.9.1 release at the end of the week >>>>>> as there are a couple of bugs I'd like published by the time Java 9 is >>>>>> released. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> > >
