On 12 November 2017 at 13:53, Scott Deboy <scott.de...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's right -forgot we rev'd to 2.1 internally (info.plist, release > notes, couple other places). > Any particular reason? > Would it be easiest to release the new version as 2.1.0.0 instead of > 2.0.0-rc1? Otherwise I could downgrade 2.1 refs, we never had an > official release with that rev. > I could re-roll as 2.1.0-rc1 (or rc2?). I chose 2.0.0 since there's no tags or releases for any 2.x release at all, so it seemed like a logical starting point. And thanks for testing! We should be able to clean up for a proper 2.x release. :) -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
