Requiring Java 8 minimum would make more sense to start with for Core and the other modules. It's too bad that Java 8 and 9 added language features that would have been immensely useful for maintaining a backwards compatible API (default and private methods on interfaces), though I suppose that will be more useful in the future century when most applications have Java 8 or 9 as the minimum.
On 2 December 2017 at 16:02, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > And here you are complaining we haven’t moved to Java 8 as the minimum... > > http://slf4j.42922.n3.nabble.com/qos-ch-slf4j-5f0078-slf4j- > api-now-requires-Java-6-td4026870.html <http://slf4j.42922.n3.nabble. > com/qos-ch-slf4j-5f0078-slf4j-api-now-requires-Java-6-td4026870.html> > > > Ralph -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
