Re: SLF4J now requires Java 6

[Mikael Ståldal]

On 2017-12-03 00:24, Matt Sicker wrote:

It's too bad that Java 8 and 9 added language features
that would have been immensely useful for maintaining a backwards

compatible API (default and private methods on interfaces),

Did Java 9 add anything more than Java 8 for this?