I've finished converting the main site. Let me know if you notice anything odd.
On 6 April 2018 at 12:09, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just tested out a simple page conversion using maven-site-plugin and > asciidoc. It still renders into the same site template, so it's not the > "full" asciidoc experience by default so to say. It actually avoids that > problem entirely for now! > > On 6 April 2018 at 11:58, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I'm definitely +1 on AsciiDoc to replace Markdown. >> >> I am not sure if there is a nice way to make a full coherent site out of >> AsciiDoc pages; I haven't found a good way to link these pages with >> something like a shared top navigation menu or so. >> I end up creating a section (which shows up in the left-hand navigation >> menu) which contains almost no text other than a link to another page. >> For example: http://picocli.info/#_github_project , >> http://picocli.info/#_issue_tracker etc. >> Workable but could be better. >> >> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:50 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> >> wrote: >> >> > I’ve had some trouble with Markdown as it seems the version supported by >> > Maven is limited. I’m happy to switch to something that works better. >> That >> > said, I am perfectly comfortable writing xdoc as well. >> > >> > Ralph >> > >> > > On Apr 6, 2018, at 9:29 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > I've been using AsciiDoc for the Scala site, and I know others here >> have >> > > used it as well. I was thinking it would be nice to standardize on it. >> > > There is an asciidoctor plugin for maven-site-plugin, so we can use it >> > with >> > > our existing layout for now as well for Log4j. >> > > >> > > One major advantage for us is that you can easily include source file >> > > snippets via macros. This would make our documentation more easily >> > > maintainable as it wouldn't get out of sync. There could be some other >> > > documentation generators explored later for Log4j plugins and such >> which >> > > would be pretty neat, too. Another advantage is that asciidoc has its >> own >> > > macros and such which are more useful than velocity. >> > > >> > > What do you think? If there aren't any objections, I'll supersede my >> > > earlier markdown efforts with asciidoc instead. >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
