I'm looking forward to it. It's easier to accept PRs and do other housekeeping stuff straight from GitHub. Our current process requires me using dedicated computers since I don't want to set up ssh keys everywhere (e.g., on work computers).
On 19 June 2018 at 09:02, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote: > I sure appreciate you are taking this on Matt, whenever it comes :-) > > Gary > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 7:50 AM Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > No offense taken! I didn’t want you all to think I dropped the ball here. > > ☺️ > > > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 08:32, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On 2018-06-18 20:34, Matt Sicker wrote: > > > > There's plenty of good reasons to migrate! I've just been rather busy > > > > lately (currently closing on a new condo), so I haven't had a chance > to > > > > follow through with this. Since there are pom updates and site > patches > > to > > > > accompany this, I'd rather not launch it off when I can't intervene > to > > > > clean up the results. > > > > > > I hope you haven't taken this message as an offense and if so I would > > > like to apologize. I've not intended in no way to make this message an > > > offense but upon receiving a feedback from infra I thought this is > > > something worth to be shared with everyone. > > > > > > > > > > > On 18 June 2018 at 13:22, Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Moving to gitbox would give github users ci outputs and thus provide > > > >> automated feedbacks from ci when pull requests are built. > > > >> > > > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/plugins/servlet/mobile# > > > >> issue/INFRA-14492/comment/16516065 > > > >> > > > >> On Thu, 14 Jun 2018, 16:57 Matt Sicker, <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I haven't had a chance to follow up with Infra (since I know this > > will > > > >> take > > > >>> a bit of collaboration to change). I'm thinking to start backwards > > from > > > >> any > > > >>> repos that don't have any upcoming or recent releases, then > > progressing > > > >>> forward until all of them have been moved. > > > >>> > > > >>> On 13 June 2018 at 20:19, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>> Whatever happened with this? > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Ralph > > > >>>> > > > >>>>> On May 7, 2018, at 8:38 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> And here is my +1. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> This vote passes with 5 +1s binding and 1 +1 non-binding. I'll > > follow > > > >>> up > > > >>>>> with the migration details over the next couple days. > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> On 30 April 2018 at 07:04, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> > > > >> wrote: > > > >>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> Ralph > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 29, 2018, at 7:38 PM, Ílson Bolzan <ilbol...@gmail.com> > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2018 at 3:20 PM, Matt Sicker < > boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>> Good point on the clarification. I said all git repos, and > that > > > >>>> actually > > > >>>>>>>> entails: > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> * chainsaw > > > >>>>>>>> * log4cxx > > > >>>>>>>> * log4j2 and all its repos > > > >>>>>>>> * log4net > > > >>>>>>>> * log4php > > > >>>>>>>> * parent pom > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> In fact, the only repos this doesn't cover are the old log4j 1 > > svn > > > >>>> repos > > > >>>>>>>> that we have. > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> On 29 April 2018 at 05:08, Dominik Psenner < > dpsen...@gmail.com > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>> Also for the log4net repository. > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Apr 2018, 23:59 Remko Popma, < > > remko.po...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:48 PM, Gary Gregory < > > > >>>>>> garydgreg...@gmail.com > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Gary > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018, 17:12 Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com > > > > > >>> wrote: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> This is a vote to migrate from the existing git-wip-us > > > >>>>>>>> infrastructure > > > >>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the currently supported gitbox infrastructure that Infra > > > >>> advocates > > > >>>>>>>>> for > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> using nowadays. Using gitbox will allow our projects to > > > >>> integrate > > > >>>>>>>>>> better > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> with GitHub including the ability to merge PRs directly > from > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>>> site > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the ability to push commits to GitHub and have them be > > > >>>>>>>> automatically > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mirrored back to Apache. Not only that, but new Apache > > > >> projects > > > >>>>>>>>> cannot > > > >>>>>>>>>>> use > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the old git-wip-us infrastructure anymore, so it makes > sense > > > >> to > > > >>>>>>>>> migrate > > > >>>>>>>>>>> to > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> the best supported option going forward. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The migration process will entail the following: > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Marking existing git repo as read-only > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Moving repo to gitbox > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Update website and pom.xml with new SCM URLs > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> * Update local git clones with the new remote URL(s) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Note that this vote only applies to the source code. I'm > not > > > >>>>>>>>>> considering > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> using GitHub Issues instead of Jira, for example. Note > also > > > >> that > > > >>>>>>>> this > > > >>>>>>>>>>> vote > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> does not apply to the use of subversion for publishing the > > > >> site > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (svnpubsub) > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> nor the use of it for publishing releases (only available > > via > > > >>>> svn), > > > >>>>>>>>>>> though > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> moving the sites from svnpubsub to gitpubsub (i.e., > storing > > > >> the > > > >>>>>>>>>> generated > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> site in a branch called "asf-site", similar to the > > "gh-pages" > > > >>>>>>>> branch > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> feature on GitHub) would be a related topic to cover > > > >> separately. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote +1, +0, -0, or -1. > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>>>> -- > > > >>>>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>>>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>>> > > > >>>>> > > > >>>>> -- > > > >>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>> > > > >>> -- > > > >>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> > > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
